<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>CounterHacktivism.Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/</link>
    <description>EMERGING THREATS PROACTIVE RESPONSE TEAM</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.1.2 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:10:42 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Missouri Spammers Indicted</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/22-Missouri-Spammers-Indicted.html</link>
            <category>Spam</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/22-Missouri-Spammers-Indicted.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=22</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=22</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Ryan Guidry)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;     University of Missouri student, Osmaan Ahmad Shah, and brother, Amir Ahmad Shah were indicted on 51 counts of spam-related activities. More than 2,000 US colleges and university email addresses were compromised and used to lure $4,191,966 from solicited advertisements. They &amp;quot;used false and misleading information in the spam e-mails, suggesting&lt;br /&gt;
they had an association with the university or college that the student&lt;br /&gt;
receiving the spam attended. They allegedly used fictitious name and&lt;br /&gt;
purported to be &#039;campus representatives&#039; from the college of the&lt;br /&gt;
student receiving the spam. They also falsely claimed that the&lt;br /&gt;
businesses who manufactured or sold the products in the spam e-mail&lt;br /&gt;
were &#039;alumni-owned&#039; companies.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;     The Shah&#039;s are charged with violating the 2003 CAN-SPAM Act. They face jail time and stand to lose 4 million dollars in revenues, two properties in Missouri, and a 2001 BMW.&lt;/p&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:54:07 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/22-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Spam and the Environment</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/21-Spam-and-the-Environment.html</link>
            <category>Security</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/21-Spam-and-the-Environment.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=21</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=21</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Viswa Adusumilli)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
According to a recent study by &lt;a title=&quot;Carbon Footprint of Spam&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=323&amp;amp;entry_id=21&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://resources.mcafee.com/content/NACarbonFootprintSpam&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;McAfee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=323&amp;amp;entry_id=21&quot; title=&quot;http://resources.mcafee.com/content/NACarbonFootprintSpam&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://resources.mcafee.com/content/NACarbonFootprintSpam&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt; Inc.&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;spam e-mail is not only a nuisance, but is damaging to the environment&lt;br /&gt;
and substantially contributes to green house gas (GHG) emissions.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
About 33 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh) or energy is used yearly around&lt;br /&gt;
the globe to send, handle and filter out spam emails. This wastage of electricity can &lt;a title=&quot;McAfee, Inc. Research Reveals the Environmental Impact of Spam&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=325&amp;amp;entry_id=21&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://newsroom.mcafee.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=3499&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;power &lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;2.4&lt;br /&gt;
million homes&amp;quot; and the GHG emissions are equal to &amp;quot;3.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
passenger cars using 2 billion gallons of gasoline.&amp;quot; Just imagine the&lt;br /&gt;
positive impact caused by taking &lt;a title=&quot;Host of Internet Spam Groups Is Cut Off&quot; href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=326&amp;amp;entry_id=21&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/12/AR2008111200658.html&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;McColo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
offline last year. About 62 trillion spam messages are transmitted&lt;br /&gt;
every year and McColo going down provided the same benefit obtained by&lt;br /&gt;
removing 2.2 million cars off the road for one day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Some important findings from the study include:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;The average GHG emission associated with a single spam message is 0.3&lt;br /&gt;
grams of CO2. That&#039;s like driving three feet (one meter); but when&lt;br /&gt;
multiplied by the yearly volume of spam, it is equivalent to driving&lt;br /&gt;
around the earth 1.6 million times. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;bwlistitemmarginbottom&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the energy consumption associated with spam (nearly 80 percent)&lt;br /&gt;
comes from end-users deleting spam and searching for legitimate e-mail&lt;br /&gt;
(false positives). Spam filtering accounts for just 16 percent of&lt;br /&gt;
spam-related energy use. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;bwlistitemmarginbottom&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Spam filtering saves 135 TWh of electricity per year. That is&lt;br /&gt;
equivalent to taking 13 million cars off the road.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;bwlistitemmarginbottom&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If every inbox were protected by a state-of-the-art spam filter,&lt;br /&gt;
organizations and individuals could reduce todays spam energy by 75&lt;br /&gt;
percent or 25 TWh per year, the equivalent of taking 2.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
cars off the road. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;bwlistitemmarginbottom&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Countries with greater Internet connectivity and users, such as the&lt;br /&gt;
United States and India, tended to have proportionately higher&lt;br /&gt;
emissions per e-mail users. The United States for example, had&lt;br /&gt;
emissions that were 38 times that of Spain. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;bwlistitemmarginbottom&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
While Canada, China, Brazil, India, the United States and the United&lt;br /&gt;
Kingdom had similar energy use for spam by country, Australia, Germany,&lt;br /&gt;
France, Mexico and Spain tended to come in about 10 percent lower.&lt;br /&gt;
Spain came in at the lowest, with both the smallest amount of e-mail&lt;br /&gt;
that was received as spam and the smallest amount of energy use for&lt;br /&gt;
spam per e-mail user.&amp;quot;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p /&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:35:31 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/21-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Security Release</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/20-Security-Release.html</link>
            <category>Security</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/20-Security-Release.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=20</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=20</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Ryan Guidry)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   Well another April 1st came and went. I&#039;m usually apprehensive when April approaches for there is mass hysteria concerning the security of computing devices. This year the threat carries the name &#039;Conficker&#039; or &#039;Downadup.&#039; Although nothing of notable significance triggered on April first, the industry is finding that the conficker threat is still growing. It is mutating and adapting. Conficker.E is the latest variety discovered and I&#039;ll let you guess as to its malicious intent... that&#039;s right! Spamming. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are you serious? Come on! When will I get a break?!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only a couple of days ago Microsoft released their newest Security Intelligence Report where they estimated a little over (a whopping) 97% of all email traffic is spam. Hmmmmm. What was the Conficker infestation estimation? Something like 10 to 13 million computers? Hmmmm. Are they spamming?! Ouch. I hope this number doesn&#039;t continue to grow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please be advised, my friends:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Homeland Security Release&quot; href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=329&amp;amp;entry_id=20&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/pr_1238443907751.shtm&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;Homeland Security Release&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=330&amp;amp;entry_id=20&quot; title=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a994f6.shtml&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a994f6.shtml&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;Cisco Security Advisory&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is important stuff guys. Please keep up!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let us worry about the spam. Whatever this nasty worm can think of mutating into next; it won&#039;t beat our AI engine. Learn, evolve, infect, spam..... Just try it. I dare you. Whatever time it takes you to develop a new spamming technique - it will merely take the Interceptor a millisecond to reject you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I won&#039;t let another April approach bother me any longer. I get no breach in protocol. Protocol breaches will be auto-magically, but politely, shown the Ether-door.&lt;/p&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:01:13 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/20-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Spam: Friend or Foe</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/19-Spam-Friend-or-Foe.html</link>
            <category>Spam</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/19-Spam-Friend-or-Foe.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=19</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=19</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Lionel Oliver)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
		@page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in }&lt;br /&gt;
		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }&lt;br /&gt;
	--&lt;/style&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;Did you realize you are under attack? Yeah, thats right! You are being targeted by certain companies and/or individuals known as spammers that are flooding the internet with junk email called spam. These unwanted emails are a form of advertising referred to as viral marketing which also includes pop up ads that often promote bogus products and services to unsuspecting people and newsgroups while on the internet. These spammers are sending the same messages over and over trying to force or coerce you to buy a product or purchase a service that you wouldnt buy under normal circumstances. And guess whos paying them to constantly harass you with this bothersome emailYOU!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An article Im reviewing called What is spam? by J.D. Faulk comes from spam.abuse.net, an anti-spam website that has been actively fighting this annoying marketing tool since 1996 to keep the internet useful to everyone. Scott Hazen Mueller, also joins Mr.Faulk in leading this revolution against spam, he has written multiple articles and books on how to fight against the many different types of this nuisance.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;!-- The thin line off to the left of the words is spam and near nuisance below indicate that there are changes you have not accepted yet.  There is a feature on the review tab called Accept. If you click it youll find an option to accept all changes in document or you can accept and move to next to see what each is.  --&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/19-Spam-Friend-or-Foe.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Spam: Friend or Foe&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:22:34 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/19-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Defining Spam</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/18-Defining-Spam.html</link>
            <category>Spam</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/18-Defining-Spam.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=18</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=18</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Viswa Adusumilli)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/uploads/antispam.serendipityThumb.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;Image courtesy of www.topnews.in&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is spam? How do we define spam? If you sign up for a free account at a store&#039;s website with the hopes of winning a couple of tickets to the Super Bowl and receive a newsletter from them, does it still constitute as spam? When it comes to newsletters, their legitimacy is a tossup depending upon the end-user&#039;s preferences. Certain users want their newsletters to pass through and others do not. Fortunately, the Interceptor caters to both parties thereby clearing up the IT administrator&#039;s proverbial plate. An end-user&#039;s involvement in this matter is strictly limited to a few drag-and-drop moves which take no longer than five seconds. And then there is email which can be undeniably categorized as spam.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Messages that offer (read: poorly advertise) &amp;quot;growth&amp;quot; pills, real estate deals, a ton of cash and other gimmicks can be safely categorized as spam. According to Princeton University&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=314&amp;amp;entry_id=18&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://wordnet.princeton.edu/&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;WordNet at Princeton University&quot;&gt;WordNet&lt;/a&gt;, spam is &amp;quot;unwanted e-mail (usually of a commercial nature sent out in bulk)&amp;quot; with special emphasis on the word commercial. (Unsolicited) bulk email is annoying. It&#039;s even more annoying than bulk snail mail. Most bulk email can be classified as spam. Bulk spam feeds off of people&#039;s technical competence (or the lack thereof) by tricking them into clicking on unsafe links to buy various unmentionables. The first step towards stopping the spread of spam is to inform end-users to never click on any spam email links. If spammers notice low hit rates from their target(s), they will look elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:02:12 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/18-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Large Spam Gang Shutdown!</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/16-Large-Spam-Gang-Shutdown!.html</link>
            <category>Spam</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/16-Large-Spam-Gang-Shutdown!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=16</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=16</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Viswa Adusumilli)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), on Tuesday, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=308&amp;amp;entry_id=16&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g--Q7ujqtEDW291SuIQid-d8k9aAD93QIAF80&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;US authorities shutter worldwide spam operation&quot;&gt;shutdown&lt;/a&gt; one of the largest spam operations in the world which accounted for up to a third of all major spam around the world. The masterminds behind this operation were two individuals - an American and a New Zealander. Their method involved sending out billions of e-mail messages offering prescription drugs, male enhancement drugs and weight loss pills at dirt cheap prices. According to Steve Baker, Director of the FTC&#039;s Midwest Region, &amp;quot;Servers in China hosted the Web sites and the drugs were shipped from India, while operatives in Cyprus and the former Soviet republic of Georgia processed credit card information.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The gang violated three rules outlined in the &lt;b&gt;CAN-SPAM Act of 2003&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;The origin of the e-mail was masked by spoofing the header.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The e-mail did not include an &amp;quot;opt-out&amp;quot; link.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The e-mail did not include a physical postal address for the organization.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;In addition to the above, the operation did not ask the buyers for proof of a doctor&#039;s prescription and the shipment did not have doctor&#039;s/dosage information. &amp;quot;A federal judge in Chicago issued a temporary injunction to halt the operation and also froze its assets. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is investigating and those involved could also face criminal charges&amp;quot;, Baker said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bottom line? Delete &lt;u&gt;ALL&lt;/u&gt; e-mails that offer prescription drugs at low prices while offering male enhancement and weight loss pills in the same e-mail.&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/16-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>How frustrated are you with spam?</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/15-How-frustrated-are-you-with-spam.html</link>
            <category>Spam</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/15-How-frustrated-are-you-with-spam.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=15</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=15</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Murali Chakravarthi)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
So I was browsing the web for some&lt;br /&gt;
information on an electronic component for one of the projects I am&lt;br /&gt;
working on, and I came across Bill Shackelford&#039;s blog. Bill has come&lt;br /&gt;
up with quite an interesting and weird way of dealing with his spam. &amp;quot;SpamTrap&amp;quot; as he calls it receives the spam email that he gets. It then&lt;br /&gt;
prints the email on REAL paper and immediately shreds the paper.&lt;br /&gt;
Treehuggers might go totally bonkers on this one, however he is using&lt;br /&gt;
100% recycled paper. Take a look at his SpamTrap, on the webpage there&lt;br /&gt;
is a video of it working as well.. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/15-How-frustrated-are-you-with-spam.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;How frustrated are you with spam?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:54:23 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/15-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>BizTech Expo</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/14-BizTech-Expo.html</link>
            <category>Espion Newsletters</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/14-BizTech-Expo.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=14</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=14</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Viswa Adusumilli)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
After having a great year snaring spam, our focus now is to provide the same efficiency and effectiveness of the enterprise class Interceptor to small and medium sized businesses (SMBs). Entering the new market compelled us to concentrate on making the appliance easily affordable for SMBs without actually compromising the effectiveness of the device. Having said that, entering the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy50aGViaXp0ZWNoZXhwby5jb20v&amp;amp;entry_id=14&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.thebiztechexpo.com/&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;The BizTech Expo&quot;&gt;BizTech Expo&lt;/a&gt; was a way for us to show SMBs that we can fix their spam issues for way cheaper than what our competitors cost combined with higher capture rates. We&#039;re glad to have shared our business information with &lt;a title=&quot;Business Report&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5idXNpbmVzc3JlcG9ydC5jb20=&amp;amp;entry_id=14&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.businessreport.com&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;Business Report&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/14-BizTech-Expo.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;BizTech Expo&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:44:25 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/14-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MP3 Spam</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/13-MP3-Spam.html</link>
            <category>Spam</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/13-MP3-Spam.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=13</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=13</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Viswa Adusumilli)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    You gotta admit. Spammers are unequivocally getting more creative with their methods. The latest spam is being transmitted through an MP3 file. The file can be opened with any audio player and usually contains a persuasive bit (usually in a &amp;quot;synthesized female voice&amp;quot;) encouraging people to purchase a certain stock. According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=289&amp;amp;entry_id=13&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39290170,00.htm?r=2&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Spammers launch MP3 pump-and-dump campaign&quot;&gt;ZDNet UK&lt;/a&gt;, &amp;quot;The spam contains no text or subject header while the attached MP3&lt;br /&gt;
files, according to security firm Sophos, are named after popular&lt;br /&gt;
artists such as Elvis Presley, Fergie or Carrie Underwood.&amp;quot; As for now, MP3 spam is not as serious as PDF or image-based spam because of the size of the file itself. MP3 files are larger in size compared to PDFs and images and this causes &amp;quot;extra costs associated with carrying it.&amp;quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=290&amp;amp;entry_id=13&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,203805.shtml&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Massive MP3 Spam Outbreak Hits Users; Constitutes 7-10% of Global Spam&quot;&gt;Earthtimes&lt;/a&gt; announced recently that MP3 spam currently accounts for 7-10% of all global spam. Even though these numbers are not significantly high to cause worldwide concern, the randomness of the filenames combined with the end-user&#039;s limited technical knowledge, MP3 spam is bound to cause havoc for a while.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:00:46 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/13-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>YouTube Spam?</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/12-YouTube-Spam.html</link>
            <category>Spam</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/12-YouTube-Spam.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=12</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=12</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Viswa Adusumilli)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, well, well...it looks like spammers are now exploiting YouTube&#039;s features to spam the heck out of us. &amp;quot;Just when I thought that I was out they pull me back in.&amp;quot; Not really. I just felt like throwing that Michael Corleone line out there. Alright, getting back to the issue at hand, YouTube allows us to view and post various videos on the Internet through a common portal (if you did not already know that, please shoot me an e-mail and I would be more than happy to recommend a few good middle schools to you). Users are allowed to leave comments under each video. From my experience with these comments, they are usually flame wars between adrenaline powered teenagers which I find to be quite entertaining. I just realized that these comments have nothing to do with this article. Note to self: stop taking off on tangents.&lt;span id=&quot;articleBody&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/12-YouTube-Spam.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;YouTube Spam?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:53:37 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/12-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>PDF Spam on the Decline?</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/11-PDF-Spam-on-the-Decline.html</link>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/11-PDF-Spam-on-the-Decline.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=11</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=11</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Viswa Adusumilli)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
According to &lt;a title=&quot;iTnews: Vendors disagree on PDF spam volumes&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=283&amp;amp;entry_id=11&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.itnews.com.au/News/57282,vendors-disagree-on-pdf-spam-volumes.aspx&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;iTnews&lt;/a&gt;, PDF spam is on the fall. Hmm...that sure was a short lived attempt by spammers to increase stock prices. Paul Ducklin of Sophos claims that PDF spam is dying out because it requires more user interaction than regular/conventional spam and is therefore not as successful as its predecessor (oh wait! Regular spam is still around). I think we all agree with him when he says that PDF spam has been around for a while now but in the last couple of months, it has gone from being a rare occurrence to almost replacing the usual (read: monotonous) spam. The failure of PDF spam due to a higher requirement of user interaction is actually a blessing for both sides. Spammers might (most likely) start focusing on releasing new types of spam with as little user interaction as possible. I really don&#039;t think there is a much easier way to spam people other than the conventional method but that is no excuse to take this issue lightly. Until we start experiencing a fairly large drop in inbound PDF spam, we assure you that our Software Development Team is constantly working on it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By the way, &lt;a title=&quot;The CAN-SPAM Act can seem confusing. What are the keys a marketer needs to know about compliance?&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url_id=284&amp;amp;entry_id=11&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.btobonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070726/FREE/70725010/1084/FREE&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;BtoBonline.com&lt;/a&gt; has an excellent description of what is considered spam (based on the CAN-SPAM Act). I&#039;m sure you won&#039;t be disappointed.&lt;/p&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:30:46 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/11-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>5 long years and still no stoppin' it!</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/10-5-long-years-and-still-no-stoppin-it!.html</link>
            <category>Spam</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/10-5-long-years-and-still-no-stoppin-it!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=10</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=10</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Jarred White)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    It has to have been at least five years since I worked at &lt;i&gt;espion&lt;/i&gt;. I cut my teeth on the support line and bloodied my nose on the ping-pong table, but I always felt like I was making a difference. I learned a lot from that first support job. It taught me how to handle clients, manage time and setup Postfix. Most of the skills I acquired there, I still use today. I remember when I started, we were just hearing news about anti-spam legislation being passed here, there and everywhere in between. Even with all those politicians clamoring to fix the problem, it seems like &lt;i&gt;espion &lt;/i&gt;is still keeping spam out of peoples&#039; inboxes.&lt;p /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/10-5-long-years-and-still-no-stoppin-it!.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;5 long years and still no stoppin&#039; it!&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:43:19 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/10-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>July 2007 Espion Newsletter</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/9-July-2007-Espion-Newsletter.html</link>
            <category>Espion Newsletters</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/9-July-2007-Espion-Newsletter.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=9</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=9</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Derek Tircuit)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 14pt; color: rgb(157, 154, 94);&quot;&gt;Welcome to the newsletter!&lt;span&gt;                        &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 9pt; color: rgb(63, 67, 74); font-family: Verdana;&quot;&gt;Weve decided that the greatest customers in the world (thats you) should be kept up to date with the latest developments from us.&lt;span&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;Well send out little notes like this periodically to keep you up to date on whats happening with us, and with your Interceptor.&lt;span&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;Of course, if youd rather not receive these from us, just email or call us, and well remove your address.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/9-July-2007-Espion-Newsletter.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;July 2007 Espion Newsletter&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:03:21 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/9-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>And you thought image spam was crazy!</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/8-And-you-thought-image-spam-was-crazy!.html</link>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/8-And-you-thought-image-spam-was-crazy!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=8</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Viswa Adusumilli)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in;&quot;&gt;&lt;!-- s9ymdb:15 --&gt;&lt;img width=&quot;650&quot; height=&quot;245&quot; src=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/uploads/ImageBasedPDFSpam.jpg&quot; style=&quot;border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;&quot; /&gt;I guess &lt;a title=&quot;Spam Today, Gone Tomorrow, Back the Day After&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb3VudGVyaGFja3RpdmlzbS5jb20vaW5kZXgucGhwPy9hcmNoaXZlcy82LVNwYW0tVG9kYXksLUdvbmUtVG9tb3Jyb3csLUJhY2stdGhlLURheS1BZnRlci5odG1s&amp;amp;entry_id=8&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/6-Spam-Today,-Gone-Tomorrow,-Back-the-Day-After.html&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;I spoke too soon&lt;/a&gt; (is that even possible). The spammers are at it again. This time around, it&#039;s PDF stock spam. In the past, barely comprehensible text about certain public stock (which happens to be from a company that nobody has ever heard of before) was embedded into an image and sent out to random e-mail addresses. It was lovingly (guaranteed to provide that fuzzy feeling in your belly) called image based spam. Ever since blocking image spam became an easier task than teaching your dog to sit for the &lt;a title=&quot;Click here to learn more about the Interceptor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/exit.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5lc3Bpb25pbnRsLmNvbQ==&amp;amp;entry_id=8&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.espionintl.com&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;Interceptor&lt;/a&gt;, spammers have undoubtedly moved on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/8-And-you-thought-image-spam-was-crazy!.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;And you thought image spam was crazy!&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:52:59 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/8-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>You've received a postcard from a family member!</title>
    <link>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/7-Youve-received-a-postcard-from-a-family-member!.html</link>
            <category>Spam</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/7-Youve-received-a-postcard-from-a-family-member!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=7</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.counterhacktivism.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=7</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Derek Tircuit)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ORLY?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, not really.  Here&#039;s the latest spam I&#039;ve seen:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good day.&lt;br /&gt;Your family member has sent you an ecard from csomesillyURLer.hk.&lt;/p&gt;Send free ecards from catcher.hk with your choice of colors, words and music.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Your ecard will be available with us for the next 30 days. If you wish to keep the ecard longer, you may save it on your computer or take a print.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To view your ecard, choose from any of the following options:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;--------&lt;br /&gt;OPTION 1&lt;br /&gt;--------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Click on the following Internet address or copy &amp;amp; paste it into your browser&#039;s address box.&lt;br /&gt;http://csomesillyURLher.hk/?somereallylonghashhere&lt;br /&gt;--------&lt;br /&gt;OPTION 2&lt;br /&gt;--------&lt;br /&gt;Copy &amp;amp; paste the ecard number in the &amp;quot;View Your Card&amp;quot; box at http://somesillyURLher.hk/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Your ecard number is&lt;br /&gt;somereallylonghashhere&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best wishes,&lt;br /&gt;Postmaster,&lt;br /&gt;catcher.hk&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*If you would like to send someone an ecard, you can do so at http://somesillyURLer.hk/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;&lt;hr /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/7-Youve-received-a-postcard-from-a-family-member!.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;You&#039;ve received a postcard from a family member!&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:16:42 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counterhacktivism.com/index.php?/archives/7-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>